iVillage GardenWeb iVillage GardenWeb THE INTERNET'S GARDEN & HOME COMMUNITY ADVERTISEMENT
Blogs Forums Photo Galleries Ask The Experts Tools & Directories        
Return to the Sustaining Our Environment Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Changing Light Bulbs Down Under

Posted by vgkg (My Page) on
Wed, Feb 21, 07 at 11:15

Australia to Ban Old-Style Light Bulbs

By Rohan Sullivan
Associated Press
posted: 20 February 2007
02:40 pm ET

SYDNEY, Australia (AP)—The Australian government on Tuesday announced plans to phase out incandescent light bulbs and replace them with more energy-efficient compact fluorescent bulbs across the country. Legislation to gradually restrict the sale of the old-style bulbs could reduce Australia's greenhouse gas emissions by 4 million tons by 2012 and cut household power bills by up to 66 percent, said Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

Australia produced almost 565 million tons of greenhouse gases in 2004, official figures show.

Prime Minister John Howard said the plan would help all Australians play a part in cutting harmful gas emissions: ``Here's something practical that everybody will participate in.''

In incandescent light bulbs, perfected for mass use by Thomas A. Edison in the late 19th century, electricity flows through a filament to create light. Much of the energy, however, is wasted in the form of heat.

Australia is not the only place looking to replace them with fluorescent lighting, which is more efficient and longer lasting.

Last month, a California assemblyman announced he would propose a bill to ban the use of incandescent bulbs in his state. And a New Jersey lawmaker has called for the state to switch to fluorescent lighting in government buildings within three years.

Cuba's Fidel Castro launched a similar program two years ago, sending youth brigades into homes and switching out regular bulbs for energy-saving ones to help battle electrical blackouts around the island.

The idea was later embraced by Castro's friend and ally, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who announced his own program to save energy and in recent months has given away millions of incandescent bulbs in neighborhoods nationwide.

Under the Australian plan, bulbs that do not comply with energy efficiency targets would be gradually banned from sale. Exemptions may apply for special needs such as medical lighting and oven lights.

Fluorescent bulbs are currently more expensive than incandescent bulbs, but use only about 20 percent of the power to produce the same amount of light and last longer, making them more competitive over time, advocates argue.

Environmentalists welcomed the light bulb plan, but noted than the vast bulk of Australia's greenhouse gas emissions come from industry, such as coal-fired power stations.

They urged the government to set national targets for emission reductions and renewable energy.

``It is a good, positive step. But it is a very small step. It needs to be followed through with a lot of different measures,'' Australian Conservation Foundation spokesman Josh Meadows told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio.

Howard has become a global warming convert, conceding in recent months for the first time that human activity is having an effect on rising temperatures.

But he has steadfastly refused to bring Australia into line with most of the world and ratify the Kyoto protocol on greenhouse gas reductions, arguing that doing so could damage Australia's coal-dependent economy.

Here is a link that might be useful: Source


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Changing Light Bulbs Down Under

interesting post vgkg thanks.

Ive been using the fluorescent bulbs for a few years now and while they are expensive compared to the regular bulbs they do last a lot longer aswell. I think the price is the reason more people dont use them.

""Environmentalists welcomed the light bulb plan, but noted than the vast bulk of Australia's greenhouse gas emissions come from industry, such as coal-fired power stations."

Unfortunately the Howard Govt hasnt exactly been a champion of the environment and it's only since the UN report on global warming and climate change that they are no longer dismissing it as heresay. But with an election looming in the not too distant future, sadly I think a lot of these plans are just to pretend they are doing something, rather than addressing the more serious causes of emissions. I guess it all helps, but I think they will drag their feet as long as possible - the howard govt is a very pro industry govt.


 o
RE: Changing Light Bulbs Down Under

Howdy, Vgkg!

Yep, one small step for man etc....but as trancegemini says, more of a timely political stunt methinks, but at least some good will come of this one. I've been using the fluoros for years (I'm not connected to the grid, only have solar electricity, so every drop counts) and am very happy with them. I quite often just use candles, too.

Now if only the govt could organise some widespread rain, they'd probably get enough votes to return to power, but both those scenarios seem unlikely...

Regards,
Shax


 o
RE: Changing Light Bulbs Down Under

OK, so if everyone starts using fluorescents, then what is the next step that could be widely adopted? Seems like 'everyone'can't see past this step, at least on a large scale?

What do you recommend should be the next big step? Some criteria that come to mind that would make the next big step practical would include:
1.Saves money
2.Item can be bought, installed, and forgotten about
3.Involves minimal change in behavior.

Here are some possibilities:
insulation
window shades/curtains
energy star appliances
solar ovens
programmable thermostat
Non of the above are so easy and simple to use or install as a light bulb.


 
 

 

 


Click here to learn more about in-text links on this page.



iVillage GardenWeb: The Internet's Garden & Home Community  
  iVillage Home & Garden Network